Where’s ψ3 gone?

When the distinction between the spherical space of ”JIGEN-KANSATSUSHI（Dimension- Paratiron)“,ψ3 and that of ψ4 becomes apparent, an interesting sensation begins to grow in our consciousness that we’ve never had before; we start to feel that there are two ways of being in the mutual inclusion of the spherical spaces of ψ3 and ψ4, as shown in Figure 1 below. (Here, we assume that both Ψ3 and Ψ4 can be freely expanded and contracted.)

 1. The figure on the left shows the spherical space of Ψ3 enveloping the spherical space of Ψ4.

2. The figure on the right shows the spherical space of Ψ4 enveloping the spherical space of Ψ3.

 Let’s discuss this with a concrete example to help evoke your image here.

Suppose there is a basketball in front of you, about 1 meter (3ft) away. At this time, the person experiencing the manifestation of ”Dimension- Paratiron“ is aware that the space outside the basketball is inverted, so he or she sees it is like the spherical space of “Dimension-Paratiron”,ψ3. In other words, the space that corresponds to the background of the basketball is not the extended space where the basketball expands as it is, but a spherical space where the front and back are turned inside out, where the side of the basketball’s surface becomes the background surface.

 On the other hand, the interior space of the basketball will be seen as a spherical space that seems to bulge toward you, and that is no different from your familiar sense toward the spherical space of the ball. In other words, at this time, the outer spherical space side of the basketball is the space formed by “Dimension-Paratiron”, Ψ3. On the other hand, The inner spherical space side is formed by “Dimension-Paratirons”, Ψ1 to Ψ2.  The spherical space of Ψ3 and that of Ψ1 to Ψ2 will be perceived as spaces that have a twist to each other (see Figure 2 below).

 From here, the spherical space of the following “Dimension-Paratiron”, Ψ4 is grasped as a reflection of Ψ3. It is formed where the positional sense of “I” in front of the basketball is born. The basketball and the “I” watching it: ……. In your mind, you must have an image of the line of gaze that connects the two in your consciousness.

  Now, this time, rotate your gaze around the basketball. Then you will see that to make this rotation, “I,” as an observer, have to go around the basketball. At this time, the sphere space in ψ4 is formed by the rotation of the gaze of “I.”

 As you can see by actually doing it, the directionality of spatial orientation of the spherical space of ψ4 is almost the same for the spherical space of ψ1~ψ2 (spherical space as the bulk of an object/matter). What is different is whether or not the observer’s position is included in the space. In other words, the spherical space of ψ4 can be thought of as an image of the spherical space of ψ1~ψ2 as the bulk of the object, extended to include the position where you are as an observer. The concept of 3-dimensional coordinates used in physics usually considers you, “I,” as an observer as a mere object and quickly throws you into it. This is the very framework of the spherical space of “Dimension-Paratiron”, ψ4.

  Now, recall that the space of ψ1~ψ2 gives rise to the scaling concept of length and size. In physics, such a space with only magnitude is called a scalar space. Although I can’t say for sure yet, I think that the region of “Dimension-Paratirons”, Ψ1 to Ψ2 may correspond to this scalar space in physics. In other words, it is a space in which the concept of scale is established.

  Conceptually, when a scalar possesses a direction, it becomes a vector. If we assume that Ψ1 to Ψ2 is a scalar space (with only magnitude and no direction), then the direction of the force is created in Ψ4, which constitutes a three-dimensional vector space. This makes it possible to distinguish between scalar space and vector space in actual spatial perception. That’s very interesting. In fact, there are potential forces such as electromagnetic forces and gravitational forces in space that physics is thinking about. However, we do not know what causes them, and these forces partition physical phenomena with directions. OCOT says the following:

  Human consciousness is a directional force that Incident-matter* possesses…＊Incident-matter: The result of the projection of the whole mind structure of human beings, i.e., matter (2013: The Day God Sees God. Glossary p.233) 　

  Here, what OCOT calls “directional force” is the key. In terms of physics, this is a vector. I’m trying to say that the force and direction that physics treats as physical force may be deeply related to the concept of “observer’s position” that human consciousness has. In other words, the force of self-localization in the human unconscious that “I” am at this place or position in space may appear as a vector of force in physical space. If this is the case, there is no such thing as a purely physical force but rather an unconscious conceptual force in space. This means that without the existence of human beings as observers, no force or direction can be created in space.

  Oops, I’m getting sidetracked again. Let’s go back on the track before making the story too complicated.

  Due to my poor explanation, some people still do not understand the inversion relationship between “Dimension-Paratirons”, ψ3 and ψ4 explained here. If you are one of those people, you may want to imagine the following situation and try to imagine the inversion.

  When you trace the surface of the spherical space created by this “Dimension Paratiron”, ψ4 by rotating your gaze, you find that you, as the observer “I,” who was initially on the front side of the basketball, move to the other side. In other words, “I,” who was on this side of the basketball, moved to the other side by turning around the basketball. At the “I” position that has moved around to the other side, you still have the image of yourself in front of the object. This is “NAIMEN (the Inside=invisible) of human being” (see Figure 3 below).

  The space that “I” see as the background surface of things/matters is “the Outside (visible)” of human, so this kind of spatial recognition arose from ψ4 is completely misjudging space. It was quite a shock for me when I first realized it, and it made me wonder —Where in the world is the space in front of me, “the Outside (visible)” of human that I am actually seeing? 

　Man has not yet been able to capture with his intellect the place where perception is taking place — that was the first conviction that I came to have when the manifestation of “the Outside (visible)” of human occurred to me. —-To be continued.