When we hear that an observer is involved with an event, the first thing we think of is the observer’s gaze. The line connecting the eye and the object is usually called the gaze, but in our general spatial perception, we conceptualize the gaze as a line segment in three-dimensional space, because we throw ourselves as observers into three-dimensional space as physical entities. There is a coffee cup in front of me. The distance between me and the coffee cup is about 50cm. And so on.
However, this distance of 50cm as depth is not an objective space, as I mentioned before. In other words, if the plane, on which the coffee cup is floating as a projected image, is a two-dimensional plane consisting of the x-axis and y-axis, the line from the coffee cup to the observer, “me,” tends to be interpreted as a three-dimensional direction. However, due to the nature of space-time, there is a slight temporal distance. If the information in the image of the cup is brought about by the “light” emitted from the cup, then in a very precise sense, the cup seen there is not the cup of “this moment”. If this is the case, then the line of sight is inevitably four-dimensional. This dimensional interpretation of the line of sight does not require bringing up the transformer-type Gestalt unique to Noos, but simply applying the space-time concept of the current physical concept to the space around the observer. In other words, the subjective line (depth) is the fourth dimension of space-time.
Now, what about the objective line connecting “there” and “there” on the other hand? This line segment, of course, is not a line of sight. Since it is a line connecting the object and the object, there is no observer on the line, and no traffic network as “visible light” has been laid out there. To use the expression, I used in “The Ark of Light”, the light rays running along this segment are “light in the dark” that has nothing to do with seeing. Since such light is invisible, it is just light imagined by our consciousness. The speed of such light is called 300,000 km per second in physics. And we have fallen into a situation where we don’t know the meaning of that speed.
In this sense, the event I wrote about last time, “the photon emitted from the flashlight hitting the screen on the right-hand side,” is an event experienced by “light in darkness,” and it is only through the meta-dimensional event of being witnessed by an observer that this event is brought into phase with light in light.
But the trouble is that in the physical worldview, as I mentioned earlier, the observer looking at the world is treated as a mere position in space-time, just like any other object, and so the “light within the light” never appears. So, in the language of philosophy, existence is ignored. This is the main point where philosophers feel that the naive realism worldview portrayed by physicists is fishy. The OCOT information for light in darkness is as follows.
What the Sirius intelligence calls “KATACHI (structure, form)” refers to the “manifestations of unconscious structures” (the “ideas” of Noosology), but according to OCOT information, human consciousness has not yet developed the ability to hold these ideas as objects of thought. As you can easily see by examining the inside of our self-consciousness, the objects of thought of human consciousness are mostly those of the sensory representational world, extracted from the sense organs, such as matter (form and color), sound, and images. It was Bergson who said that matter is also just an image, but in this sense, our thoughts always work with the representations we get through our senses and their attributes.
In Noosology, our concept of matter is called the “Delusional reflection of the organism.” The meaning of this is the independence of the concept of matter, which is constructed as if matter actually exists, even though it is not actually visible as “light within light.” Regardless of me, the world is filled with matter. …… These conceptual formations are not realities, but rather products of concepts, which means that there is no solid matter in space-time. No, more to the point, the locality itself, which is the ground of the substance of space-time, is merely a product of concepts.
Light as 300,000 kilometers per second that has fallen into the darkness of space-time and has lost its way. Let’s call this light Lucifer, following the Old Testament. It is time for us to call this Lucifer back to the light within the light. The beautiful angelic chief with twelve pure white wings, who was banished into the darkness for rebelling against God, is now flying around in the dark of night, transformed into a huge eyeless bat covered with black hair. In order to resurrect this fallen angelic chief as the Lucifer (light-carrying angel) that he was meant to be, we need to transform the meaning of light from mere physical light to the workings of spiritual light. This means that we need to embark on what the Gnostics call a “salvation of light”. The conception of Mary, the descent of the power of Sirius, the entry into creation space, and the ascension. From the perspective of Noosology, all of these are also the story of this transformation of light from Lucifer to Lucifer. –To be continued
Related Articles
50 Ways to Leave your Time Vol.11
The three-dimensionality of the object/matter as a three-dimensional object/matter and ...
TEXT BY
KOHSEN HANDA
50 Ways to Leave your Time Vol.20
However, many may have difficulty accepting the idea of looking at a 3-dimensional...
TEXT BY
KOHSEN HANDA
50 Ways to Leave your Time Vol.16
I'm up to (16) in "50 Ways to Leave Your Time" essays. Some of you may be annoyed because...